Shared Decision-Making in Autoimmune Care: How Patients and Doctors Balance Risks and Benefits Together

Shared Decision-Making in Autoimmune Care: How Patients and Doctors Balance Risks and Benefits Together Dec, 1 2025

When you’re living with an autoimmune disease like rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, or lupus, every treatment choice feels like a gamble. One drug might cut your flare-ups in half-but could also raise your risk of a rare, life-threatening infection. Another might be easier to take, but less effective. And no doctor can decide for you what matters most: your job, your family, your fear of needles, or your desire to travel. That’s where shared decision-making comes in-not as a buzzword, but as the only way to make treatment fit your life, not just your lab results.

What Shared Decision-Making Really Means

Shared decision-making isn’t just asking, “What do you want to do?” It’s a structured conversation where you and your doctor work as a team. You bring your values, fears, and daily realities. Your doctor brings the data: how likely a drug is to work, how often it causes serious side effects, and what the alternatives are. This isn’t theory. It’s backed by real studies. In one analysis of over 3,200 people with autoimmune conditions, those who took part in shared decision-making stuck with their treatment 82% of the time. Those who didn’t? Only 63%.

For example, if you have rheumatoid arthritis and your doctor suggests a biologic like adalimumab, they shouldn’t just say, “This works well.” They should say, “About 60 out of 100 people see at least a 20% improvement in symptoms. But 1.8 out of every 100 people on this drug each year get a serious infection-like pneumonia or tuberculosis-that needs hospital treatment. Methotrexate, another option, helps about 50 out of 100 people, with fewer infections but more liver stress.” That’s the difference between being told what to do, and being helped to choose.

Why This Matters More in Autoimmune Diseases

Autoimmune diseases are tricky. There’s rarely one right answer. Many treatments suppress your immune system-so while they stop your body from attacking your joints or nerves, they also make you more vulnerable to infections, cancers, or other complications. The risk isn’t theoretical. With natalizumab for multiple sclerosis, the chance of developing a rare brain infection called PML is about 1 in 1,000 after two years of use. That’s low-but if it happens, it’s devastating. So who decides if that risk is worth it? You do. But only if you understand it.

Studies show patients who get clear, absolute numbers-not percentages or vague warnings-are far more likely to make choices they don’t regret. Saying “your risk is 0.1%” sounds tiny. Saying “1 in 1,000 people get this” makes it real. That’s why tools like the MS Decisions app from the University of Michigan, which shows risks as “1 in 1,000 over two years,” get 4.6 out of 5 stars from patients. It’s not about scaring you. It’s about giving you the truth.

How It Actually Works in a Doctor’s Visit

A good shared decision-making visit doesn’t take hours. It takes about 9 to 14 minutes. Here’s how it breaks down:

  1. Team talk (1-2 minutes): “I want to make sure we’re making this decision together. What’s most important to you right now?”
  2. Option talk (5-7 minutes): Your doctor shows you the choices-using simple charts, videos, or printed tools. They explain: “Here’s what each option does, how often it helps, and how often it causes problems.”
  3. Decision talk (3-5 minutes): “Based on what you’ve told me and what we’ve seen, which option feels right for you?” Then they help you pick, or schedule a follow-up if you need more time.

Many clinics now use free decision aids from the Arthritis Foundation or the National MS Society. These aren’t fancy apps-they’re plain-language booklets with pictures, real numbers, and space for you to write down your thoughts. One patient on Reddit said, “When my rheumatologist showed me actual data comparing TNF inhibitors using decision aids, I felt empowered to choose the option that fit my travel-heavy job.” That’s the goal.

A woman looks at a glowing app interface showing personal health priorities like travel, injections, and infection risk, with soft light highlighting her thoughtful expression.

Where It Falls Short-and Why

Even though shared decision-making is recommended by the American College of Rheumatology and the American Academy of Neurology, it’s not happening in every room. In a 2021 survey, 78% of doctors said they don’t have enough time. One patient told the National MS Society, “My neurologist listed three MS drugs in 90 seconds with no discussion of how they’d fit my nursing schedule.” That’s not shared decision-making. That’s rushed advice.

Another problem? Health literacy. If you’ve never heard what “ACR20 response” or “TNF inhibitor” means, you can’t make an informed choice. That’s why some clinics use “teach-back”-asking you to explain the options in your own words. Studies show this improves understanding by 41%. Also, older patients and those with lower education levels benefit less from digital tools. A 2022 study found they need extra support-like a nurse walking them through the options-just to get the same benefit as others.

What’s New in 2025

The tools are getting smarter. In March 2023, the FDA cleared the first AI-powered decision aid for rheumatoid arthritis called ArthritisIQ. It pulls data from your electronic health record and your own symptom logs to generate a personalized risk-benefit summary. If you’ve been having more joint pain but fewer flares, it might suggest your current drug is still working better than you think. If you’ve been skipping doses because of side effects, it flags that before your next visit.

The Multiple Sclerosis Association of America launched the “MS Values Compass” in early 2023. It asks you to rank what matters most: “Can I travel?” “Do I mind injections?” “How scared am I of infection?” Then it matches your answers to treatment options. In its first six months, over 12,000 people used it. That’s not just tech-it’s personalization.

Insurance is catching up too. Medicare now ties 9% of payments to patient satisfaction scores-and shared decision-making is a big part of that. The Choosing Wisely campaign has 17 autoimmune-specific recommendations urging doctors to talk about patient values before prescribing. In Europe, guidelines now require doctors to document shared decision-making before starting biologics. That’s led to 22% higher appropriateness in prescriptions compared to the U.S.

Diverse patients in a clinic hold personalized tools, each surrounded by glowing icons representing their life goals — travel, work, family — under warm afternoon light.

What You Can Do Right Now

You don’t need to wait for your doctor to bring it up. Here’s how to start:

  • Before your appointment, write down: “What’s most important to me?” (e.g., “I want to avoid hospital visits,” “I need to keep working full-time,” “I can’t handle daily pills”)
  • Ask: “Can we use a decision aid for this?” The Arthritis Foundation and National MS Society offer free ones online.
  • Ask for numbers: “How many people out of 100 get better? How many get seriously sick?”
  • Ask: “What happens if I wait?” Sometimes, waiting is the safest option.
  • Bring someone with you. A second set of ears helps you remember what was said.

If your doctor resists, say: “I’ve read that shared decision-making improves adherence and reduces costs. Can we try it today?” You’re not being difficult-you’re asking for evidence-based care.

The Bottom Line

Shared decision-making isn’t about giving you all the power. It’s about giving you the right information so your choices match your life. Your doctor isn’t just a gatekeeper of drugs-they’re a guide through uncertainty. And in autoimmune care, where every choice carries weight, that guide matters more than ever.

The best treatment isn’t the one with the highest success rate. It’s the one you’ll actually take-and stick with-because it fits who you are. That’s not magic. That’s medicine done right.

Is shared decision-making only for biologics?

No. Shared decision-making applies to any treatment where there’s more than one reasonable option. That includes choosing between methotrexate and sulfasalazine for rheumatoid arthritis, deciding whether to start an oral MS drug like dimethyl fumarate or an injectable like interferon, or even whether to try physical therapy before adding a new medication. It’s used when the risks and benefits aren’t clear-cut-and that’s true for most autoimmune treatments.

What if I don’t know what I want?

That’s completely normal. Many people feel overwhelmed. Good shared decision-making doesn’t force you to decide on the spot. Tools like the MS Values Compass or Arthritis Foundation decision aids help you explore what matters to you. You can take them home, talk to family, come back later. The goal isn’t speed-it’s clarity. Your doctor should support you in figuring it out, not rush you.

Are decision aids reliable?

Yes-if they’re from trusted sources. The Arthritis Foundation, the National MS Society, and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute develop their tools using peer-reviewed data and patient feedback. They avoid hype and focus on real numbers: “1 in 100,” “60% improvement,” “0.5% chance of liver damage.” Avoid online blogs or pharma ads that say “miracle cure” or “no side effects.” Real decision aids show both sides.

Can I ask for shared decision-making even if my doctor doesn’t offer it?

Absolutely. You have the right to be part of your care. You can say, “I’ve read that shared decision-making helps people stick with their treatment and feel more confident. Can we use one of the decision aids from the Arthritis Foundation or MS Society?” Most doctors will say yes. If they push back, it may be a sign they’re not trained in this approach-and you might consider finding one who is.

Does shared decision-making cost extra?

No. The decision aids themselves are free. The time spent in the visit is covered by your insurance. Some clinics even bill for shared decision-making using a new ICD-10-PCS code (00Y00Z0), introduced in 2020. If you’re asked to pay for a tool or consultation, that’s not standard. Ask if they’re using publicly funded resources like those from the Arthritis Foundation.

What if my doctor disagrees with my choice?

A good doctor won’t force you to choose a treatment you’re uncomfortable with. But they should explain why they’re concerned. For example: “I understand you don’t want injections, but the oral option has a higher risk of liver damage, and your liver enzymes are already elevated. Let’s monitor that closely if you choose it.” If your doctor dismisses your values or says, “You’re wrong,” that’s not shared decision-making. It’s a red flag.

Next Steps

If you’re managing an autoimmune condition and haven’t had a real conversation about treatment options, start here: download one of the free decision aids from the Arthritis Foundation or the National MS Society. Bring it to your next appointment. Ask your doctor to walk through it with you. If they don’t know what it is, offer to show them. You’re not asking for special treatment-you’re asking for the standard of care that’s been proven to work.

Remember: your life, your body, your priorities. The best treatment isn’t the one that looks best on paper. It’s the one you can live with.

1 Comment

  • Image placeholder

    Alicia Marks

    December 3, 2025 AT 11:49

    This is the kind of post that makes me believe medicine can still be human. Seriously, thank you for laying this out so clearly. I’ve been on methotrexate for 5 years, and the first time my rheumatologist showed me real numbers instead of vague warnings? I cried. Not from fear-from relief.

Write a comment